What were the differences between fundamentalists and modernists?

What were the differences between fundamentalists and modernists?

Fundamentalism emphasizes authority and fixed creeds in religion; modernism emphasizes freedom and progress in religious thought.

What did fundamentalists do in the 1920s?

The term fundamentalist was coined in 1920 to describe conservative Evangelical Protestants who supported the principles expounded in The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth (1910–15), a series of 12 pamphlets that attacked modernist theories of biblical criticism and reasserted the authority of the Bible.

What were the similarities and differences between the modernists and traditionalists of the 1920s?

In the 1920’s had 2 types of people in the 20s, a traditionalist, or a modernist. Traditionalists wanted to live the simple life, and wanted to have a wife and kids, and mostly farm. Modernists were typically younger people, and wanted more excitement in life.

What was the conflict between fundamentalist and those who accepted evolution?

What was the conflict between fundamentalists and those who accepted evolution? That fundamentalists believed it was God who made the humans and everything, but those who accepted evolution believed in the Darwin’s theory of evolution that humans evolved from apes. People would be rebellious against the law against it.

How did modernists and traditionalists view each other?

Traditionalists were people who had deep respect for long-held cultural and religious values. For them, these values were anchors that provided order and stability to society. Modernists were people who embraced new ideas, styles, and social trends.

Which idea was supported by fundamentalists in the 1920s?

What were the major flash points between fundamentalism and pluralism in the 1920s? Fundamentalism was the support of the Bible and Christian beliefs. Fundamentalists wanted to rid Protestant denominations of modernism, which was moving towards individual freedom.

What did fundamentalists believe?

In keeping with traditional Christian doctrines concerning biblical interpretation, the mission of Jesus Christ, and the role of the church in society, fundamentalists affirmed a core of Christian beliefs that included the historical accuracy and inerrancy of the Bible, the imminent and physical Second Coming of Jesus …

How did cultural values divide traditionalists and modernists?

How did cultural values divide traditionalist and modernists? Modernists were out there learning new things. While traditionalist were back home and losing some of there population, so they took to religion and becoming strict on it.

What was the difference between the fundamentalists and the modernists?

Two broad factions within Protestantism emerged: Fundamentalists, who insisted upon the timeless validity of each doctrine of Christian orthodoxy, and Modernists, who advocated a conscious adaptation of religion in response to the new scientific discoveries and the moral pressures of the age.

What event brought the debate between modernism and fundamentalism to light?

The one crucial event that brought the debate between modernism and fundamentalism to light, was the Scopes Trial. In 1925, in Tennessee, the schools systems banned the teaching of Darwin’s theory of evolution. However, one high school biology teacher, John Scopes, challenged this ban.

Why were denominations divided in the 1920s and 1930s?

In the 1920s and 1930s several U.S. denominations endured controversy over doctrinal changes and the toleration of doctrinal differences. Liberals wanted freedom to adjust traditional belief to fit modern conditions and to unite with other denominations for concerted mission work.

Who were the moderates at the 1926 General Assembly?

The Special Committee appointed at the General Assembly of 1925 consisted mainly of moderates. The committee solicited testimony from both sides, and received statements from Machen, Macartney, and Coffin. At the 1926 General Assembly, another moderate, W.O. Thompson, was elected as moderator.